Prison Security...Needs to be more secured

A huge lockdown ordered by Gov. Rick Perry was to shake down all prisoned inmates in search for contraband cellphones, narcotics, or any other unacceptable objects that they are not allowed to obtain. Seems like these days prisons have been slacking on their security and surveillance due to not enough officers, underpaid staff, and lack of equipment. DallasMorningNews stated that we ought to have better security to prevent these inmates from possesing these contraband items. The other week StateSenatorJohnWhitmir was infuriated by the fact that a deathrowinmatecalledhisphone and threatned his daughters. How on earth did these phone calls from a celled convict reach Mr. Whitmir? Turned out that one of the prison guards had accepted a bribe from the inmate in return for a cell phone. This particulary cell phone was passed around to other inmates and made over 2,800 calls in the past month. Mr. Whitmir asked the FederalCommunicationComission on why they have not acted to make cell-signal blockers to make cell phones useless, and have only a landline phones. Only a fifth of the prison unit has metal detecters, that tells us that convicts can easily smuggle in narcotic, money, phones, or anything else. Another reason that perhaps convicts have easy access to these objects is due to guards being bribed in allowing these transactions to happen. Perhaps if prison guards are paid more than the starting salary per year of $25,400, guards wouldn't be suckered into these bribes and focus on keeping the units secured. We ought to look into the legislation to see if they could fork out more money for underpaid staff, and more equipment to keep these convicts from contrabanding things from the free world. For the jobs that the prison guards and correctional facilities have to do, they deal with everyday convicts that misbehave by not cooperating, stabbing, fighting, throwing feces, and even spitting on the unit staff. $25 grand a year is not worth working for and that is the reason why the units are way understaffed. Legislation should look into this in funding more money to get this issue resolved!

Exonerations Increasing !!!!

For years, Investigators and District Attorney (D.A) have used many differnt procedures to prosecute criminals. D.A's and Police dept used procedures such as: polygraphys, photo lineup, drive bys, psychological manipulation, sketch drawings, confessions and much more. DallasMorningNews reporters Steve McGonigle and Jennifer Emily (both focuses on Dallas County Crimes) have been ananlyzing recent criminal convictions and realized that DNA testing helped 18 of 19 Dallas County convictions. These DNA testing proved that these convicts were innocent the entire time.
The Unknown author of this article, opinionated that if police dept don't start cracking on a proper procedures to convict a suspect, the States should get involved. JudgeBarbaraHervey began over the summer to sort out breakdowns in justice. Looking over cases and just like D.A Craig Watkins who is currently reviewing 40 different penalty cases in Texas to be sure we have the right guy.
So far Police Dept are still currently using the "drive by" method on picking out a suspect. Drive by is meant for witnesses to be driving past the suspect in a squad car and then to point out "Yes that is him". Within moments the suspect is handcuffed and brought into the station for immediate questioning. Its methods like these that causes society to know that its just so easy to point out a person and state that they committed the crime. A 2005 sudy by Samuel Gross and his colleagues counted 340 exonerations between 1989 and 2003 and notes that these convicts spent more than a total of 3400 years in prison which averages out to about 10 years per person. The Innocence Project that specializes in exonerations via DNA evidence named 7 major causes for wrong convictions. 1. Eyewitness identifications - Research shows that the human mind is not like a tape recorder, we can't rewind our minds or play our minds exactly the way we first see it. This is why it is important to make sure that everything must be correct visual facts. 2. Unreliable scientific evidence. 3. False confessions- sometimes convicts are pressured into confessing even though they did not commit the crime cause they've been tortured or lied to stating they would get less time. 4. Misconduct by forensic scientists- they are not always 100 % sure. 5. Government misconduct - like Peter Limone. 6. Perjury by informants and snitches- Snitchers who snitch for their own benefit. 7. Bad Lawyering- Lawyers who fail to do proper work such as failing asleep during trials, fail to do thorough investigating. So far with all these exonerations, some might get compensated for their time served and some might not.

I think that with technology these days, we are a bit more advance and could hopefully decrease wrongful convictions. No one should serve time like these men, for a crime they did not commit. Its a big no-no to just do random drive bys or single mug shots to identify suspects. As a "procedural" court system, we should have proper procedures in convicting suspects with hard proof evidence. After this whole time my belief was that the court knew what they were doing, apparently not.